Sean Randall reviewed Lord of the Fire Lands by Dave Duncan
Review of 'Lord of the Fire Lands' on 'Goodreads'
4 stars
"it seems that the ending of this book paves the way for the beginning of the next", I wrote at the end of my review of [b:the gilded chain|57687|The Gilded Chain (King's Blades, #1)|Dave Duncan|http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1219589831s/57687.jpg|56199], first of the King's Blades. How very wrong I was. In fairness to me, the end was quite open and I did not know that they weren't a series in the accepted sense of the term. "Each book in this trilogy stands alone, but together they make a larger story," according to the author.
So what of the lord of the Fire Lands? I found it very compelling, intriguing, and fascinating. I can only apologise for not perhaps dedicating as much of my attention to the political nuances present in the first of the series, for having read this one I'm sure to have missed many. The geography, piracy, codes of chivalry and loyalties are …
"it seems that the ending of this book paves the way for the beginning of the next", I wrote at the end of my review of [b:the gilded chain|57687|The Gilded Chain (King's Blades, #1)|Dave Duncan|http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1219589831s/57687.jpg|56199], first of the King's Blades. How very wrong I was. In fairness to me, the end was quite open and I did not know that they weren't a series in the accepted sense of the term. "Each book in this trilogy stands alone, but together they make a larger story," according to the author.
So what of the lord of the Fire Lands? I found it very compelling, intriguing, and fascinating. I can only apologise for not perhaps dedicating as much of my attention to the political nuances present in the first of the series, for having read this one I'm sure to have missed many. The geography, piracy, codes of chivalry and loyalties are all spot on, with the theme of a Blade's binding coursing through the work as a thread through a tapestry.
The perspective also shifted radically between these 2 books - the first focusing on the blades as a group and Durendal in particular, and this work moving the focus to Radgar and the Baelish people. First impressions aren't always what they seem, of course (witness Gerard) but the Bael are not pushovers, by any stretch.
The third tale, so I hear, shifts once again, focusing on Malinda. that will be interesting.
one question, for anyone who has survived this long. Ambros IV was shot between the eyes by Radgar, yet he died in the first book in a different way entirely, acceding the thrown to Malinda. Book 2 says Ambros died in the twentieth year of his reign, betrayed by Baelish treachery, which fits with the second work but not the first ("My father died in a fire of unknown origin"). We won't dispute the fact that unknown origin is a bit of a stretch, but unless I am getting some characters very muddled up (which is quite possible) I don't understand.
That's my only big niggle, though, and this book truly made me look at the first one in a new light. perhaps rereading it will answer my question, or perhaps the third one will tie things up.