castlerocktronics started reading My Brilliant Friend by Elena Ferrante
My Brilliant Friend by Elena Ferrante
From one of Italy's most acclaimed authors, comes this ravishing and generous-hearted novel about a friendship that lasts a lifetime. …
Just a guy, reading books like the rest of you.
This link opens in a pop-up window
From one of Italy's most acclaimed authors, comes this ravishing and generous-hearted novel about a friendship that lasts a lifetime. …
Turner, corporate mercenary, wakes in a reconstructed body, a beautiful woman by his side. Then Hosaka Corporation reactivates him for …
@norb I'm also now remembering that Up In Michigan turned out to be the first story he ever published, which made me want to put much of my own writing in the bin.
@norb I really enjoyed this collection too, and know what you mean about how modern a lot of it seems. Hemingway had a very publicly macho persona, and so when I first read him it was a little bit at arm's length expecting some of that to bleed through. I was really surprised by his actual writing about masculinity though, though I can't tell how much that is me as a reader colouring what I read with my own biases.
I definitely had this sense, especially with bull fighting (which he is absolutely obsessed with), that he was really interested in the performative aspect of masculinity, and he has so many characters who act in brash and stupid ways that cost them dearly (often with their lives) just to prove themselves as fearless or manly to other people, often other men. Two that spring to mind are the story about …
@norb I really enjoyed this collection too, and know what you mean about how modern a lot of it seems. Hemingway had a very publicly macho persona, and so when I first read him it was a little bit at arm's length expecting some of that to bleed through. I was really surprised by his actual writing about masculinity though, though I can't tell how much that is me as a reader colouring what I read with my own biases.
I definitely had this sense, especially with bull fighting (which he is absolutely obsessed with), that he was really interested in the performative aspect of masculinity, and he has so many characters who act in brash and stupid ways that cost them dearly (often with their lives) just to prove themselves as fearless or manly to other people, often other men. Two that spring to mind are the story about the man and his wife on safari whose wife covets the big-game hunter guide with them after her husband ran from the lion. This then drives him to overcompensate when they see another lion, in order to restore his wife's respect (though it's implied it was perhaps already gone), and he gets himself killed. The other one, was one of the really brief interludes, about two spanish boys, one of whom tells the other he is not afraid of bulls. To prove this to his friend, he asks him to tie knives to the legs of a chair and then come at him. It ends with him getting gored and bleeding out. These two really stuck with me long after reading, as they just seemed so different to the public image of Hemmingway in how critical they seem to be of the macho expectation of fearlessness.
The story that really, really stood out to me though was Up In Michigan about the girl who day dreams about the farm hand coming back from the hunting trip and then it ends with her fantasy evaporating as he shows interest in her, but with far more forcefully than she had hoped for, and it ends in her being assaulted by him. There was something in the austerity of the language but how evocative it is in the depicition of having a crush, and how heartbreaking the ending is, that really struck me. He also absolutely represented the traditional, forceful masculinity of the love interest as a destructive and harmful thing which caused both deeply physical and emotion pain to the protagonist.
The collection really flipped my third-hand inherited perception of Hemmingway on its head. I really enjoyed most of it.
I had bought the entire Sprawl trilogoy some time ago, together with Burning Chrome. I was quite lukewarm on Neuromancer so I had been putting Count Zero off for a while and only really got around to it after changing how I take things from my to-read shelf (no more putting things off!).
I definitely enjoyed this a lot more, and it solidified my feelings on what it was that prevented me from enjoying Neuromancer as much as I had hoped too.
While Neuromancer had only really one pov character, I found it really hard to orient myself while reading it. Locations seemed to change in a way that I found hazy and indistinct, too transient characters would appear and fade away, and I was never quite sure where we were or who anyone beyond the protagonist and Molly were. Tracking all of this required a level of attention that …
I had bought the entire Sprawl trilogoy some time ago, together with Burning Chrome. I was quite lukewarm on Neuromancer so I had been putting Count Zero off for a while and only really got around to it after changing how I take things from my to-read shelf (no more putting things off!).
I definitely enjoyed this a lot more, and it solidified my feelings on what it was that prevented me from enjoying Neuromancer as much as I had hoped too.
While Neuromancer had only really one pov character, I found it really hard to orient myself while reading it. Locations seemed to change in a way that I found hazy and indistinct, too transient characters would appear and fade away, and I was never quite sure where we were or who anyone beyond the protagonist and Molly were. Tracking all of this required a level of attention that I honestly didn't really want to give, as I didn't find it rewarding to invest.
Count Zero splices together three points of view that converge at the end in a very satisfying way. But it is far clearer where we are and who is in the scene. There are still some parts, particularly with the mercenary, where there are a few too many characters introduced at once and not well differentiated from one another as they are all other mercs. Other than this though, Count Zero should be harder to follow, but it was very much the opposite. And it made it a lot easier to get into and enjoy.
Until the end, I felt that it was something that could have been enjoyed as a standalone work, but the climax wouldn't make much sense without the context of Neuromancer's climax.
There's definitely something really unique about Gibson's writing as well. I can't sum it up well, but the general sense of the world the characters inhabit as being overwhelming and something they are very much resigned to and powerless under comes across so well. Some really creative turns of phrase that I'm not used to from sci-fi (though it's not my main go-to, so this just could be lack of experience).
I've got a few things to go through before Mona Lisa Overdrive, but I'm looking forward to it much more after this.