norb finished reading The Cuckoo’s Egg by Clifford Stoll

The Cuckoo’s Egg by Clifford Stoll
In the days when the presence of a computer did NOT presume the presence of a network (they used to …
just a guy who reads sometimes
This link opens in a pop-up window
16% complete! norb has read 2 of 12 books.
In the days when the presence of a computer did NOT presume the presence of a network (they used to …
Content warning Maybe a little bit of a spoiler ahead but probably not much. Nothing to ruin the plot, anyways.
I've never read any Nabokov before. Had never been really interested in Lolita, just due to the noise around it. Decided to read this book on a whim because it was available at my local library and I needed something for a trip.
I am glad I picked this one! I found this book confusing in a good way. What is the point? I think it's meant to be a bit of a lark on Russian emigres, and university culture in general (something I have first hand knowledge of). It was much funnier than I expected (a bit more on that later).
Pnin is a very interesting character. His description really reminded me of Gru from Despicable Me, down to the funny accent and way of speaking. (Maybe they cribbed him for the movie? I have no idea.)
The little vignettes give a view into this man's strange world. His past is interwoven with his present, kind of. The narrator/writer clearly has a fondness for the main character, and you kind of find out why by the end.
There isn't much conflict to the story. There aren't many big, dramatic moments. There are some very funny bits - to whit "The evolution of sense is, in a sense, the evolution of nonsense." I had to read it 3 or 4 times to get it, but when I did HA! Other little one liners and "throw away" jokes abound. There are bits of other languages (especially Russian), mostly phonetically written in English, and I think probably a few jokes in those snippets that I didn't get.
Overall, it was a pretty lighthearted read about a character that is both believable and unbelievable at the same time. By the end, you are kind of left to question if the stories are actually true or not since they are being recounted second- and possibly third-hand, but it probably doesn't really matter, which is maybe the point.
I will definitely check out more Nabokov. The Luzhin Defense seems interesting for sure!
In the days when the presence of a computer did NOT presume the presence of a network (they used to …
Content warning Maybe a little bit of a spoiler ahead but probably not much. Nothing to ruin the plot anyways,
Once again, Martha Wells spins out a fun Muderbot tale.
I've enjoyed the journey that Wells has taken us on in regards to Murderbot's progress to more "humanity."
In many ways, Murderbot is often the most humane of characters in these stories as it is always putting itself in danger before the "real" humans.
I enjoyed that as these books have progressed, SecUnit has had to become more human for survival, but also apparently for it's own self improvement. As it ran out of more and more drones in this story, it even commented on how being a human must be terrible.
I'm always impressed with Wells' ability to put the reader into the shoes of something that is inherently not human, but yet still shows us a better side of humanity.
A City on Mars (EBook, 2023, Penguin Press) 5 stars
I really enjoyed the breadth (and depth) of the analysis the Weinersmith's make in this book. The science-y bits were great, but the law related pieces were the most interesting in my opinion.
I think their point about how space exploration geeks just completely skip over law was really insightful. The fact that we already have international law that most likely applies to the moon, and the different reasons why powerful countries agree to international law or not, was interesting.
After reading this book, I came away significantly less enthusiastic about a settlement on Mars (or the Moon) however I still, like the authors, think it is a good use of time and money if done the right way.
Cybersecurity is my job, so I came into this book with some amount of knowledge of the subject, but I still found it a fascinating read.
At first, I was slightly annoyed that Shapiro was making up new words (downcode, upcode, metacode) to describe things we already have word for in the industry, but as I read the book I started to see why he's using these words.
Shapiro does a great job of using the ideas of downcode (what you might consider regular computer code), upcode (generally the ethics or rules that the computer user has), and metacode (the rules that exist "above" the user, such as laws). By defining these three ideas, Shapiro makes the case that cybersecurity is not a technology problem at all, but rather a human problem.
This idea is something that I've tried to instill in others at my day job, but it is …
Cybersecurity is my job, so I came into this book with some amount of knowledge of the subject, but I still found it a fascinating read.
At first, I was slightly annoyed that Shapiro was making up new words (downcode, upcode, metacode) to describe things we already have word for in the industry, but as I read the book I started to see why he's using these words.
Shapiro does a great job of using the ideas of downcode (what you might consider regular computer code), upcode (generally the ethics or rules that the computer user has), and metacode (the rules that exist "above" the user, such as laws). By defining these three ideas, Shapiro makes the case that cybersecurity is not a technology problem at all, but rather a human problem.
This idea is something that I've tried to instill in others at my day job, but it is something that is hard for people to understand, even those that work in the IT/cybersecurity industry. Many technical people think you can solve all problems via technical means. This is what Shaprio calls "solutionism" near the end of this book (if I remember correctly, the word "solutionism" is actually coined by someone else).
I found myself comparing this book to another one I read recently, A City on Mars by Zach and Kelly Weinersmith. Both of these books take what is ostensibly a "technical problem" and then start to apply the human element to it, with the end result being about the same. Technology cannot and will not solve all of our problems. We really have to do it in the messy human world.
Fancy Bear Goes Phishing is an entertaining account of the philosophy and technology of hacking—and why we all need to …
Fancy Bear Goes Phishing is an entertaining account of the philosophy and technology of hacking—and why we all need to …
I enjoyed this book. The pacing and overall tone reminded me of John Scalzi or Joe Abercrombie. The plot is predictable in places, but that doesn't really hurt the story. There are a number of moments where just the right thing happens at just the right time, and the story does get a little into the "nothing real bad will happen and if it does it will be ok later" territory, but for the most part that didn't bother me.
If you are looking for a deep thinking, obtuse plot where nothing is spelled out for you, this book is not that. If you're looking for a fun read with interesting takes on fantasy tropes, with more or less likable characters, this might be more your speed.
All in all it was an enjoyable read and I will check out the sequel at some point.
"Clay Cooper and his band were once the best of the best -- the meanest, dirtiest, most feared crew of …
"Clay Cooper and his band were once the best of the best -- the meanest, dirtiest, most feared crew of …