Tuhnsoo reviewed Watchmen by Alan Moore
Review of 'Watchmen' on 'Goodreads'
4 stars
Better than the movie
Hardcover, 464 pages
English language
Published Oct. 5, 2005 by DC Comics.
It took me years to read Watchmen. Every time I'd get to the men in tights and the giant naked blue guy, I'd think, "Ack! Superhero comic!" and put it down again. It wasn't that I was against comics. I'd read 2000AD Monthly religiously since 1989 and Alan Moore's The Ballad of Halo Jones, about a girl from an interplanetary ghetto who wanted to get "out", was my favourite series of all. But I liked the dark, twisty stuff that had something to say about the world and superhero comics seemed tediously codified with no room for moral ambiguity. I should have known better. What Moore does best, even at his silliest or most obtusely philosophical, is subvert. He uses story to crack open the dark places of the human soul like a crab shell, revealing the pasty meat within, and then pokes it with …
It took me years to read Watchmen. Every time I'd get to the men in tights and the giant naked blue guy, I'd think, "Ack! Superhero comic!" and put it down again. It wasn't that I was against comics. I'd read 2000AD Monthly religiously since 1989 and Alan Moore's The Ballad of Halo Jones, about a girl from an interplanetary ghetto who wanted to get "out", was my favourite series of all. But I liked the dark, twisty stuff that had something to say about the world and superhero comics seemed tediously codified with no room for moral ambiguity. I should have known better. What Moore does best, even at his silliest or most obtusely philosophical, is subvert. He uses story to crack open the dark places of the human soul like a crab shell, revealing the pasty meat within, and then pokes it with a cattleprod to see it writhe.
He's the kind of writer who makes you feel very smart (Kitty Genovese and the moral bankruptcy of crowds in Watchmen, for example) and very stupid (a dozen obscure Victorian literature references interwoven into every page of League of Extraordinary Gentlemen) at the same time. He pushes the medium. Every panel, every background detail, every interlude, whether a vaudeville song or a beat-style short story or seemingly wholly unrelated pirate horror comic, counts. He stretches the boundaries of storytelling in ways other writers wouldn't attempt, let alone pull off – and does it with a ferocious social conscience that challenges everything we are.
And when he has a mind to, when he's not off on some grand mal meditation on the nature of magic or sexual desire or what stories mean, Moore tells the perfect story. Inventive. Surprising. Original. Utterly devastating. From being the comic I couldn't read, Watchmen became the narrative I hold up as what fiction can be.
Better than the movie
I've seen the film, so I had some idea of the plot, although there is more in the book and some differences. I'd been meaning to read this for ages and did enjoy it. I'll have to look out for some more comic books.
Wow.
2011:
looking for a new graphic novel to start, i googled 'best graphic novels of all time' and this one kept showing up.
i leafed thru it - ugh, superheroes?
but i thought i'd give the first few pages a try... wow. layered, incredibly complex, and even poetic in spots - this was beyond what i've seen in the genre. for the first time i can see the value in re-reading (and re-reading again!) a comic book. these issues must have been thumbed raw before the next installment was released. maybe my brother's comics weren't so dumb after all
. . . . .
2015:
my second reading - reread because of another book club. still amazed me - especially how they could carry 2 stories in alternating frames that kept the same theme. reminded me of when coronation street does a good 2 story build ups, alternating the stories …
2011:
looking for a new graphic novel to start, i googled 'best graphic novels of all time' and this one kept showing up.
i leafed thru it - ugh, superheroes?
but i thought i'd give the first few pages a try... wow. layered, incredibly complex, and even poetic in spots - this was beyond what i've seen in the genre. for the first time i can see the value in re-reading (and re-reading again!) a comic book. these issues must have been thumbed raw before the next installment was released. maybe my brother's comics weren't so dumb after all
. . . . .
2015:
my second reading - reread because of another book club. still amazed me - especially how they could carry 2 stories in alternating frames that kept the same theme. reminded me of when coronation street does a good 2 story build ups, alternating the stories but continuing to build the tension, even when that first story is on pause.... but this graphic novel does it more precisely, frame by frame rather than scene by scene. more than ever I wonder how the writer and the illustrator collaborate