Redshirts

Paperback

Published May 9, 2013 by Gollancz, imusti.

ISBN:
978-0-575-13430-0
Copied ISBN!

View on OpenLibrary

View on Inventaire

4 stars (21 reviews)

Redshirts (originally titled Redshirts: A Novel with Three Codas) is a space adventure by science fiction writer John Scalzi that capitalizes on tropes from Star Trek and similar television series. The book was published by Tor Books in June 2012. The audiobook of the novel is narrated by Wil Wheaton. The book won the 2013 Hugo Award for Best Novel and Locus Award for Best Science Fiction Novel.

13 editions

Redshirts

4 stars

Pirandello meets Star Trek. Scalzi takes an interesting premise and has a great deal of fun with it as the "below decks" crew of a starship in the future start to wonder why so many of them suffer horrible deaths while the bridge crew remain unscathed. The crewmen and -women decide to investigate, and the ensuing romp gives Scalzi plenty of opportunity for humor. A fun read with some poignant moments as the plot develops.

Scalzi brings the snark

4 stars

I felt the need for a little Scalzi snark and this is the snarkiest of his novels. It delivered on that in spades along with the entertainment. I inhaled this in one sitting, and there were definite snorts and giggles as I went through it. Yes, its only 4 stars on the top line but that's because a reader needs to be in on the joke. You have to be into Star Trek etc for any of this to make sense. Quality Scalzi, can recommend.

Review of 'Redshirts' on 'Goodreads'

3 stars

This is an enjoyable, easy read. Both times I've read this I've though "ugh this is a long book for a plot that's spoiled by the back matter, and then discovered/forgotten it's a bit more clever than that, and keeps going.

But yeah I'm not quite buying "ironically bad writing and characterisation" where all the people are largely different based on snark levels.

Review of 'Redshirts' on 'Goodreads'

4 stars

What a fun read! And, Wheaton did a great job bringing the characters to life as the reader for the audio edition.

Honestly, I expected this to be a Star Trek spoof. That reference is hard to miss from the title, but it really is more than that. The meta-textual and recursive references give this story a bit more depth than the typical spoof.

Coda 3 was my favorite part of the book because there is so much potential to help future Jenkins. The Coda doesn't really satisfy my plot desires, but it gives them some life.

I give this 4 instead of 5 stars because Scalzi leaves a ton of potential on the table. The story could have continued and/or been twice as long; or he could have given us a sequel or two. There is a lot here that can be explored.

Review of 'Redshirts' on 'Goodreads'

5 stars

A pleasure to read.

Try to come to the book with only the most basic of expectations. Come knowing (hopefully) that Redshirts are the basic expendable unit in the Star Trek universe. Bring your knowledge of tropes and poorly thought out plots and thingymagics, because they'll become essential reference material for this novel.

Then let it completely defy your expectations. Most Hugo winners have an air of grandeur about them. They set out to be morality tales, or epic space operas. This one doesn't. When I first started reading I couldn't work out why this would have won such a prestigious award. By the end I was in complete agreement. It's ease of humour and air of familiarity makes this one of the most accessible science fiction books I've read for a long time. Hell, I'd almost class this outside of the SF genre and closer to satire. Can a …

Review of 'Redshirts' on 'Goodreads'

3 stars

[b:Six Characters in Search of an Author|741618|Six Characters in Search of an Author|Luigi Pirandello|http://d.gr-assets.com/books/1358967186s/741618.jpg|15468851] but funny.

Hilarious, in fact.

Not too sure about the final two chapters or the Codas, however. The codas seem a bit redundant and the final joke of the main narrative seems a bit gratuitous. I can see that the codas "close" a heap of characters and that they add an opportunity to belabour some points about what constitutes "good" and "bad" dramatic writing, but all of that seems as if it should be plainly implicit in the main work to anybody with wit enough to actually read it. "Plainly implicit" is a nice oxymoron, don't you think? Anyway - all the characters who get "closed" don't really need it, either as they are basically extras - which makes them expendable, right?

avatar for emily_rj@bookwyrm.social

rated it

4 stars
avatar for ghosttie

rated it

5 stars
avatar for roytoo

rated it

5 stars
avatar for djryan

rated it

5 stars
avatar for D-Tim

rated it

5 stars
avatar for fringemagnet

rated it

4 stars
avatar for ShelfMonkey

rated it

4 stars
avatar for Deebster

rated it

4 stars
avatar for MythicMuse

rated it

5 stars
avatar for pwaring

rated it

3 stars